The basic purpose of systematic
appraisal is to achieve better spending decisions for capital and current
expenditure on schemes, projects and programmes. This document provides an
overview of the main analytical methods and techniques which should be used in
the appraisal process. These techniques can also be used in the evaluation
process. More detailed information on individual techniques can found in
financial and economic textbooks, examples of which are listed at the end of
this document and in other guidance material on the VFM portal.
An understanding of discounting and Net
Present Value (NPV) calculations is fundamental to proper appraisal of projects
and programmes. A good understanding of Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA), Internal
Rate of Return (IRR), Multi Criteria Analysis (MCA) and Cost Effectiveness
Analysis (CEA) is also essential for economic appraisal purposes.
Cost-Benefit Analysis
The general principle of cost benefit
analysis is to assess whether or not the social and economic benefits
associated with a project are greater than its social and economic costs. To
this end, a project is deemed to be desirable where the benefits exceed the
costs. However, should the benefits exceed the costs, this does not necessarily
imply that a projects will proceed as other projects with a higher net present
value (NPV) may be in competition for the same scarce resources. In addition,
there are affordability constraints which mean that projects should not proceed
even if the NPV is positive.
In
cost-benefit analysis all of the relevant costs and benefits, including
indirect costs and benefits, are taken into account. Cash values, based on
market prices (or shadow prices, where no appropriate market price exists) are
placed on all costs and benefits and the time at which these costs/benefits
occur is identified. The analytic techniques outlined above (i.e. NPV method,
IRR method, etc.) are applied using the TDR. The general principle of
cost-benefit analysis is that a project is desirable if the economic and social
benefits are greater than economic and social costs. It is vital that
cost-benefit analysis is objective. Its conclusions should not be prejudged. It
should not be used as a device to justify a case already favoured for or
against a proposal. Factors of questionable or dubious relevance to a project
should not be introduced into an analysis in order to affect the result in a
preferred direction.
No comments:
Post a Comment